6-7x for a Self-funded Search Deal?

searcher profile

May 22, 2024

by a searcher from Indiana University, Bloomington/Indianapolis - Kelley School of Business in New York, NY, USA

Looking at a business with $3M revenue and ~$750K in EBITDA. Seller wants ~7x. The business is entirely contracted and recurring revenue, a proprietary deal, and the company has grown consistently and steadily every year for the past 7 (including the COVID years). Seems very scalable with several opportunities for growth and strong fixed cost leverage as the topline grows. In traditional search, this seems like it might work.

Does anyone have perspective on doing a self-funded search deal like this?

Pretty rich multiple, but also a great business. Wondering if there's a thoughtful way to do it with seller financing, larger equity check than a typical self-funded deal, and potentially some equity rollover. May be just too high of a multiple for the size of business though.

12
134
1,988
Replies
134
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
from University of Edinburgh in Sammamish, WA, USA
I agree with ^redacted‌ for some business deals a 7x might be ok.

It would help if you looked at how the deal will get structured. E.g., let's assume you do this:

Upfront cash: $3million - Seller rollover equity: ~$1.3million (representing 25% ownership of the combined entity) - Seller note: $~900k payable over five years at 8% interest (you asking the seller to carry a ~18% note)

1. Your yearly interest-only payments on the note will be ~72k/yr. For the first five years, you will pay $218k to be a seller.
2. If you finance the loan (i dont think SBA is applicable), but let's say you get 8% 10-year terms, you are paying $390k to service your debt.
You did not provide growth numbers, but for a business at a 7x valuation, a large portion of the price is attributed to growth value. So this should be factored into your cashflow (not EBITDA)

Also, you did talk about cash flow and other important factors your consider in a valuation, so this should be considered in your model.

So before you walk away, model this out with terms similar to what i gave above and see how this deal fits in with your overall ETA strategy and then consider this:
1. If this is your first deal, does the company give you the foundation you are looking for to develop your platform company, and can the cash generated from the deal sustain you for an extended period while you develop your platform?
2. If this is not your first acquisition, you should look at the overall fit in your portfolio and how you get the network effect through this acquisition and model that out.

DM if you need help with modeling this out, and don’t walk away before you complete this model. Great recurring revenue businesses are hard to find, and if you genuinely found one, put a bit of effort into modeling this out
commentor profile
Reply by an intermediary
from Pepperdine University in Portland, OR, USA
I'm a bit puzzled by the confident perception of many of the commenters in Searchfunder.com that a 6-7x EBITDA multiple is over-priced. I recognize that you may have capital sources who are only interested in businesses that can be acquired at a material discount, but the idea that a 6x-7x EBITDA price is "high" for businesses with $1-5 million in EBITDA is not supported by the data I see. For example, if you do an industry agnostic search of DealStats of businesses with $1-5 million in EBITDA, you'll find there are 2,753 datapoints, with a median EBITDA of $2,193,342. The median EBITDA multiple paid was 7.7x with the 25th percentile being 4.4x.

If you look just at service businesses there are 826 sold comp datapoints in this EBITDA range, and the median EBITDA is ~$2.2 million with a median price of 9x EBITDA and 25th percentile is 4.7x EBITDA. Manufacturing is similar: ~$2.4 million median EBITDA and 7.3x median EBITDA multiple.

I've had some searchers think a price of 2-4x EBITDA is an appropriate price range for a well-performing, moderate- to low-risk business - I'm not suggesting that you can't ever find a business like this - but that's not the norm as evidenced by this data.

I would agree that one of the challenges with sold comparables databases is that they fail to capture all transactions and there's likely some bias toward those that sold for higher prices, but based on my experience and observation, an industry-agnostic realistic range for average quality businesses in this size range is 4.5x - 6.5x EBITDA, and true recurring revenue models may command higher prices. For example, I'm working with one recurring-revenue service business that is preparing for a sale in###-###-#### months. It is constantly getting unsolicited strategic-buyer interest, with some suggesting they may pay >12x EBITDA.
commentor profile
+132 more replies.
Join the discussion