A Quick Word About Add Backs

 profile

April 22, 2026

by a lender from University of San Diego in Tampa, FL, USA

When I review a deal, one of the first things I check is how the seller/broker arrived at adjusted SDE/EBITDA. Standard, defensible add backs are pretty simple: → Depreciation → Amortization → Interest → Owner's compensation → Non-cash charges. That's pretty much the list. Where deals get into trouble is when cell phones, utilities, rent (when undoubtably will continue), internet, employee healthcare, and failed marketing campaigns (not exaggerating!)show up as add backs. These are ongoing operating expenses. The new owner will pay them on day one and every day after. I get the instinct. Adjusting them out makes the multiple look more attractive. But lenders will back them out, and experienced buyers spot it quickly. The cleanest path is usually the most straightforward one: base SDE/EBITDA on how the business actually runs, and limit add backs to expenses that genuinely won't continue. It builds trust, holds up in underwriting, and gets more deals to the closing table. What add backs are you seeing that give you pause?
0
4
51
Replies
4
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
from Lousiana State University in Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA
Just saw an add back labeled as "excessive fees". Basically the seller is outsourcing/overpaying for administrative jobs and added back the amount he is overpaying.
commentor profile
Reply by a lender
in Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082, USA
I have definitely seen some funny add backs that were verifiable by the sellers and some that we could not verify. I’ve also seen add backs influence the valuation.
commentor profile
+2 more replies.
Join the discussion