An investor's notes from the McGuireWoods Independent Sponsors Conference

investor profile

October 29, 2024

by an investor in Austin, TX, USA

Below are my notes from this year's McGuireWoods Independent Sponsor Conference, which are based on the public panels and my one-on-one discussions with sponsors. I sent these out earlier to Main Street Capital Network investors (a syndicate of 140+ SMB investors—individuals, family offices, and funds) and am sharing them below with the Searchfunder community in case others find them helpful.

If you're a searcher or independent sponsor who expects to raise equity in the future, don't hesitate to contact us here if you believe your deal will fit our investment criteria. We like to connect with acquisition entrepreneurs at all stages (currently searching, preparing an LOI, or an accepted LOI).

If you're an accredited investor interested in investing in search and independent sponsor deals with us, please complete this investor form.

----------------------------

redacted

During the conference, McGuireWoods released their updated independent sponsor deal survey, which you can find here.

Finding & Closing Deals

Deal Flow: This past summer was especially slow for deal flow, and while things have picked up post-Labor Day, deal flow is still generally light. The potential reasons cited included buyers and sellers waiting on Fed rate decisions and the election (my personal opinion: people may be overcomplicating this. A few intermediaries have mentioned to me that SMB earnings in many b2b sectors were weak this year, so sellers are holding off until they have an up year).

LOIs: I heard very mixed responses from sponsors on their ability to get LOIs accepted without committed funding. The general pattern I saw is that those focused on auctions/shopped deals can have trouble competing against funded PE and strategic buyers. Those finding proprietary deals do not have as much trouble getting exclusivity, particularly when the sponsor has relevant operating experience.

Deal Structure: Be careful about earnouts! Several investors and sponsors mentioned this. Disagreements over technical accounting issues can create divergent views on whether hurdles were met and cause problems down the road.

Sponsor / Investor Relationships

One-Stop Shops: Experienced sponsors were nearly unanimous in saying that, if possible, they'd prefer to avoid receiving all of their debt and equity funding from the same source. There are just too many conflicts of interest. First-time sponsors are understandably less choosy here and seemed more comfortable taking significant equity checks from an SBIC.

When to Approach Investors: Lead investors expect to form relationships before signing an LOI. If the sponsor relies on a syndicate to close a deal, though, it often makes sense not to reach out to the other investors until exclusivity is in place.

Prioritizing Investors: The #1 focus should be on investors who have done co-investments in the past and have a reputation for fulfilling their capital commitments (the latter is a big issue for sponsors, particularly among family offices). After that, things like industry experience and resources provided should be taken into account.

Control / Governance: It was surprising to hear that while most first-time sponsors were very concerned about control, the more experienced sponsors were generally less concerned and mentioned that they were consistently on the same page with their investors (my personal opinion: presumably, there was some selection bias here. I'd imagine sponsors who are having deals go poorly are finding control and governance issues more salient).

----------------------------

You can learn more about Main Street Capital Network here.

11
32
382
Replies
32
commentor profile
Reply by an investor
from University of Pennsylvania in Charlotte, NC, USA
Thanks Michael for sharing this information. It's notable that 85% were transactions with TEV $10MM or more, and 51% are $25MM and up. Especially notable that 100% of respondents had closed at least 1 deal as an independent sponsor, and 86% has closed 2 or more. So, a good bit of this survey may not be applicable to the "average" searcher or searcher deal (yes I know that average isn't a great descriptor). I personally have encountered a number of folks calling themselves independent sponsors who really aren't, which hurts their credibility - because either they don't know what independent sponsor means or are misrepresenting. Probably some people will disagree but most PEGs (and other institutional capital sources) and sizeable family offices, and other LMM deal pros understand an independent sponsor to be someone with a substantial resume of direct, firsthand, start-to-finish M&A experience - likely in the $20MM and up deal range - as a principal or advisor, or possibly an experienced CEO or COO operating in his/her industry of expertise.
commentor profile
Reply by a professional
from Dartmouth College in Los Angeles, CA, USA
Great post. Very interesting to hear about family offices not fulfilling capital commitments. I've always seen that as more of an issue with individual investors. I also very much agree that the importance of control is purely based on individual experience or experiences of those in your network. Experienced sponsors will well-established investors who they have done multiple successful deals with are less likely to care about it, while one bad deal can have the opposite effect on a sponsor who lost control of a company or it's direction.
commentor profile
+30 more replies.
Join the discussion