Calling seller's current insurer and accidentally disrupting coverage?

June 07, 2021
by a searcher from Massachusetts Institute of Technology - MIT Sloan School of Management in Miami Beach, FL, USA
I'm under LOI on a home services company asset sale. I have permission from the seller to contact the current broker since, I figure, just creating a new policy post-acquisition with the current broker will be easier than finding a new broker (so long as the price and coverage is right).
However, when the seller gave me permission, she wanted to make sure that there'd be no disruption in coverage as a result. Is that a risk?
Because, if it is a risk, then it might make sense to NOT use the current broker (since I'd need insurance coverage to start on day 1 and thus couldn't wait until post-acquisition to start shopping around).
from Northwestern University in Kansas City, KS, USA
Happy to discuss this with you directly. I am a commercial insurance broker that works in the M&A and PE space. Feel free to shoot me a note and we'll schedule a quick call: redacted
from University of Nebraska in Austin, TX, USA
If you do have time prior to close, definitely best practice to find a separate broker to price out your policies, ideally find one focused in your company's industry. They may find gaps the prior agent didn't recommend or realize. I've found insurance brokers work much harder (when trying to win new business than when they are maintaining old business. I saved $20K annually by having a new broker re-price out my policies...found my the historic broker was not actually shopping out and finding the best policies for me (surprise, surprise...). Good luck!!