Equity Split for Strategic Partners vs. Operators in Trades Businesses

searcher profile

October 30, 2025

by a searcher from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in Austin, TX, USA

Hey everyone, looking for some business entity structure advice from those who’ve done partnerships with “strategic” vs “operational” partners. I was recently approached by a close friend and his business partner who have deep relationships with government, union, and large commercial entities. They regularly help route high-value plumbing, electrical, and HVAC contracts to trusted service providers, but they don’t have the time or desire to run day-to-day operations of a service business. They’ve suggested forming a joint venture or partnership, where they bring in steady commercial work and I’d run the business, managing jobs, crews, and operations. We’d still need a Master Plumber or Master Electrician on board (likely 10% ownership minimum to use their license under Texas law). The big question: How would you structure ownership and incentives so that: • They’re rewarded when their relationships bring in real work • I retain control and upside as the operating partner • We leave room for a licensed tradesperson to come in • And equity isn’t over-allocated upfront? I’m leaning toward something like: • Majority operator ownership • Small founding equity for the “deal-flow” partners that vests or grows based on revenue they actually generate • A separate profit-share or commission on projects they bring. Has anyone here done something similar in a service business context? 

 Would love to hear how you aligned incentives or structured voting rights, profit splits, and vesting. Appreciate any thoughts — especially from those who’ve partnered with strategic partners or licensed professionals in blue-collar acquisitions.
0
3
122
Replies
3
commentor profile
Reply by a professional-advisory
from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in New York, NY, USA
I generally agree with Steve's answer. Even with regards to the commission/profit share make sure you clearly document in writing exactly what that looks like. Don't assume the currently good relationship will result in "reasonable" asks or assumptions going forward - you can negotiate the details like you're friends, but document it in a contract like you're complete strangers. You need to protect your downside if things go south, which can certainly happen when financial considerations are injected into a relationship. If they are injecting capital, try to structure their ownership so that they are non-voting shares (and this applies to the equity for the master plumber/electrician too). Since you'll be taking the operational risk you need to have control over switching marketing/lead sources or service providers as necessary.
commentor profile
Reply by an intermediary
in Austin, TX, USA
If they are not contributing capital (equity), then the joint venture makes no sense. Just pay them a commission. If they are contributing capital to the JV, then the usual logic of ownership applies. You should pay them a commission for their marketing efforts.
commentor profile
+1 more reply.
Join the discussion