Equity Split for Strategic Partners vs. Operators in Trades Businesses
October 30, 2025
by a searcher from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in Austin, TX, USA
Hey everyone, looking for some business entity structure advice from those who’ve done partnerships with “strategic” vs “operational” partners.
I was recently approached by a close friend and his business partner who have deep relationships with government, union, and large commercial entities. They regularly help route high-value plumbing, electrical, and HVAC contracts to trusted service providers, but they don’t have the time or desire to run day-to-day operations of a service business.
They’ve suggested forming a joint venture or partnership, where they bring in steady commercial work and I’d run the business, managing jobs, crews, and operations.
We’d still need a Master Plumber or Master Electrician on board (likely 10% ownership minimum to use their license under Texas law).
The big question:
How would you structure ownership and incentives so that:
• They’re rewarded when their relationships bring in real work
• I retain control and upside as the operating partner
• We leave room for a licensed tradesperson to come in
• And equity isn’t over-allocated upfront?
I’m leaning toward something like:
• Majority operator ownership
• Small founding equity for the “deal-flow” partners that vests or grows based on revenue they actually generate
• A separate profit-share or commission on projects they bring.
Has anyone here done something similar in a service business context?
Would love to hear how you aligned incentives or structured voting rights, profit splits, and vesting.
Appreciate any thoughts — especially from those who’ve partnered with strategic partners or licensed professionals in blue-collar acquisitions.
from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in New York, NY, USA
in Austin, TX, USA