Modelling Working Capital - Best Practices

December 16, 2020
by a searcher from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School in Toronto, ON, Canada
Beyond the normally accepted WC Peg of average working capital for the last 12 months, what are some best practices/modelling techniques to arrive at the ideal level of WC for a transaction, knowing that you don't know the target company's operations that well compared to the seller?
from The University of Chicago in Chicago, IL, USA
2. M&A NWC is different than accounting NWC.
3. What should be included in M&A NWC? Many good points by others. But, one should not include items like A/R and A/P just based on label. Often certain trade A/R or trade A/P need to be excluded.
4. What should one do with prepaid deposits, deferred revenue? Starting point is that they are debt-type liabilities and hence excluded. Some can be included subject for deeper drive.
5. Should buyer assume all accrued expenses and accrued wages? This is a complex subject. Often can be ignored of amount is not material. Accounting practice for COGS impacts this analysis.
6. Changes in accounting policy can impact NWC. They should be analyzed. Things get tricky whether they are on the left-side or right-side of BS.
7. NWC for businesses in healthcare, construction (w/% completion method), long production cycle get even more challenging. Recently a $40 M purchase price healthcare deal had collapsed after 12 months on WC issue. They contacted me and we brought both sides to reality. Buyer was represented by PwC.
8. I teach this subject. I share my unpublished book with the class (wrote it 10+ years ago). I introduce benefit theory and the debt-type liabilities to resolve buyer/seller conflict on the subject. Hope one of these days I can publish the book. . (I believe Deloitte has changed debt-type to debt-like)
from Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, NC, USA
p.s. - as an aside, and see other posts on the subject, the "normally accepted NWC peg" depends greatly on the size of the transaction, the industry, the data set used for comps, and thus the basis of the price (base, base+inventory, base+inventory+AR-AP, etc.).