I'm writing this after speaking to many people with conflicting beliefs, and would love to hear the communities wisdom on this topic.
I'm not sure how many of you heard of someone named Dan Pena, or Pace Morby but they both also talk about this, and I am going to leave reference of these at the bottom.
From what I have seen across searchfunder, many people align their capital stack by getting an equity partner for x %, Seller Finance x%, and Commercial lending as x%, example:
4,000,000 business (4x multiple)
10% 400,000 equity from partner
20% 800,000 Seller Finance (venter finance) or whatever term you use
70% 2,800,000 commercial loan
444,redactedannual payment - 2,800,redacted% interest, 10 year amortization
126,redactedannual payment - 800,redacted% interest 10 year amortization
= 570,redactedtotal annual payment
570,891.19 / 1,000,000 = 175.16% DSCR
Now this is what it looks like before any equity partner splits which is a pretty good deal I think most would go for these kind of numbers.
This is just an example!
my question is:
Is it possible to complete the capital stack without an equity partner meaning, can you just ask for more seller finance from the business owner to make him carry 30% instead of the 20%, and have the lenders consider the seller finance portion as the equity in the deal and not need any of your cash into it? I have heard multiple sources say that this is possible but its not something you get unless you ask for it and go for it specifically. Dan Pena teaches this method and calls it QLA.
New capital stack:
4,000,000 business (4x multiple)
30% 1,200,000 Seller Finance (venter finance) or whatever term you use
70% 2,800,000 commercial loan
444,redactedannual payment - 2,800,redacted% interest, 10 year amortization
190,redactedannual payment - 1,200,redacted% interest 10 year amortization
= 634,redactedtotal annual payment
634,323.54 / 1,000,000 = 157.65% DSCR
I've also heard and seen people push out the payment of the seller finance 5-7 years out so the deal could even be more of a slam dunk. You can refinance the sellers out at that point or just take theredacted% DSCR which is still not a bad deal considering you have full equity and didn't put any of your cash into it.
Has anyone here ever successfully done a deal without an equity partner? QLA style? This would create much faster growth and much more opportunity. I heard that Andrew Carnegie did this (2nd richest American to exist) to grow his massive steel empire and he did this because he hated having equity partners. What are your thoughts on this? Even if you don't think this is possible imagine if it was? What would your thoughts be on it if it was possible.
here is a video of Dan Pena with his Mentee Andres Mildner who built a company from scratch to 30 million in revenue and 6 million in EBITDA in just a couple of years through Dan Penas teachings. watch 6:15 where he talks about how the banks reacted to QLA
redacted
This is a video of Pace Morby, He's a real estate investor who has 1500 units and using creative finance to build his portfolio. He does the same thing as QLA but does it on real estate, and calls it the "Morby method" he even mentions which bank he uses to do this kind of transaction.
redacted
I would love to hear some bankers thoughts on this.