Just a general rule of thumb to consider, if the business is considered asset-heavy where a lot of CAPEX has gone into the facility/equipment and is therefore difficult to move from the current location, controlling your destiny by owning the real estate is always better in the long-term as you dont want to be in a position where the long-term viability of any investment involves a 3rd party landlord. There are certain strategic buyers in asset heavy industries that will not look at buying businesses where their property is owned by a 3rd party and does not have an option to buy the property. This is a less relevant issue for businesses that are asset-lite, can be easily moved.