Seeking Deal Structure Advice – Relationship-Heavy Service Business

searcher profile

August 06, 2025

by a searcher from Utah Valley State College in Lehi, Utah, United States

I’m evaluating a small service business with 3–4 FTEs including the owner, who’s been in the space for over 30 years. The company serves a handful of referral partners who act as the entire salesforce. These partners receive a large commission(40-50% gross) and handle client acquisition and retention — the business itself has no direct relationships with end clients. The partners run a complementary business and their clients need these services. This is a common structure in the industry. The business has been stable for years, but it relies entirely on the seller’s personal relationships. These partnerships are sticky due to switching costs, but there are no contracts in place, even though long term contracts with exclusivity are typical in this industry. ⸻ My Background I’ve owned and operated a similar business, and previously worked in this exact industry as a technician. I have a deep bench of techs and a few qualified middle managers ready to step. I however do not have experience working through these partners. I was direct to clients. ⸻ Key Risks • 100% of revenue depends on ~6 referral sources • No contracts — agreements are handshake-based • Seller is a key man, physically working in the business daily, as a tech • Small team — SDE likely inflated by one missing FTE • CapEx needs are nontrivial, not reflected in SDE • Diligence limited — I can’t speak with referral partners pre-close Given the lack of contract enforceability and the fact that most of the value is in the seller’s relationships, I’m unwilling to PG this deal. I also don’t believe the business is SBA financeable(correct me if I am wrong) so I’m treating this as a risk-contained opportunity where I’m willing to risk 10% cash and my time, but not personally secure the entire debt. Structure I’m Exploring • 10% cash at closing • Seller note for the equipment/assets, maybe up to 40-50% purchase price (secured, no PG) • Remaining enterprise value paid via a structured earn-out, tied to performance thresholds over 3–5 years • Earn-out could be tiered or pro rata based on SDE or gross margin benchmarks • Total valuation target is ~2.5–3x 3-year trailing SDE (asking is closer to 4x) SDE is in the neighborhood of 500k. From my seller interview, I believe we have a good shot at making an arrangement like this work, as I am assuming most other offers are also seller finance and earn out heavy, so finding the right buyer who can reliably operate and grow is essential to the seller. It’s going to be hard to find one with better business buyer fit then us. Questions for the Community • Would you lead with a full earn-out offer, or include a modest seller note to sweeten the deal? • Is it worth considering a 5–15% retained equity option for the seller with a future buyout, to help bridge the relationship handoff? • Any examples of deals that worked like this — small team, no contracts, referral-dependent? ⸻ I appreciate any thoughts or hard-earned wisdom. If I didn’t have relationships in this industry I wouldn’t touch this deal, but with my background, it might just be workable. Thanks in advance
1
5
149
Replies
5
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
from Columbia University in Fairfax, VA, USA
I looked at a deal with nearly the exact same profile (honestly, it might’ve been even riskier). Small team, zero contracts, and ~80% of revenue tied to a single entity. In my case, it was a PE-owned entity that used this company as a preferred service provider across its portfolio. On paper, the company had a big customer base... but nearly all of them came through this one PE relationship. The seller never pushed to get a contract in place because he didn't want to rock the boat. I ended up passing on the deal. A couple of years later, I actually came across a Searcher who ended up buying the business. He got an MSA in place with the PE entity post-close. Turns out, they were eager to get a contract in place. There were several reasons, but it boiled down to predictability (service + cost + SLA predictability). If your referral partners really do face high switching costs, there’s a good chance they’d welcome formal agreements. Formalizing the relationship de-risks it for both sides. If you can somehow suss this out prior to closing, that'd be ideal (though I get that's unlikely). From what you’ve shared, this seems like a strong fit for your background. You're thinking about it in the right way in terms of de-risking with the deal structure. I'd definitely consider a mix of seller note, rollover equity, and/or escrow. Since you're not going the SBA route, you've got room to be creative with all of those levers to align incentives. I'd just make sure to stay disciplined about tying any backend payments to post-close performance.
commentor profile
Reply by a professional
from University of Virginia in Holmes, NY 12531, USA
Hi Anon, first off, you’ve done a really nice job thinking this through. ^redacted‌ makes a great point re: what I call “client attrition clawback mechanisms” - randomness, but I’ve had them in I believe 7 of my last 8 closes. Would be glad to kick around ideas with you - please don’t hesitate to get me at redacted Good luck!
commentor profile
+3 more replies.
Join the discussion