Self-Employment Tax as Member of LLC?

searcher profile

June 10, 2021

by a searcher from Stanford University - Graduate School of Business in Sausalito, CA 94965, USA

I'm working on a "self funded" acquisition with SBA7 debt. I will have some outside investors. Many searchers structure their deals as LLCs, and as a result, by my interpretation, every member of the LLC has to pay self-employment taxes (15.3%, medicare + social) on their pro-rata share of the pass-through net income at the end of the year. Many business owners elect to file as S Corp to avoid this self-employment tax. However, with outside investors who want to invest via their LLCs, this doesn't seem to work.

Have other searchers using an LLC structure found a way to minimize this self-employment tax? LLC owner of the business, you work for a separate C Corp mgmt. company? 15% on my share of net income in the LLC, even if not making distributions (i.e. putting that NI on the BS for growth / add-ons) is pretty material.

Of course the general transaction could be structured as a C Corp (I've read those threads), but my acquisition is not QSBS eligible so that route loses a lot of its appeal.

Thanks!

3
13
301
Replies
13
commentor profile
Reply by a professional
from Georgetown University in Houston, TX, USA
Depends. If the LLC is a partnership for tax purposes, and the investors are truly passive (no active involvement in management or operation), there is a potential argument that they are limited partners of a tax partnership. There is some recent case law that makes that hurdle a bit more difficult to meet, but I have worked with many CPAs who have taken that position on returns.

You could also structure as an LP to be more certain. For the active investors (such as the sponsors and managers), they could invest through an S corp to take advantage of the reasonable comp exception, but still get pass-through treatment.
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
from University of Pennsylvania in Houston, TX, USA
I have an LLC with passive investors. Can't tell your exact question, but it's pretty simple. They don't pay self employment on their distributions since they are not employed. You pay payroll taxes on your W-2 earnings and don't have to pay self employment on your distributions over your W-2 earnings as long as your salary is around market. That breaks up your earnings into the earnings for your work at the company (w2 earnings) and your investment in the company (not subject to self-employment). I'm sure your CPA will be able to state this all more eloquently...
commentor profile
+11 more replies.
Join the discussion