Self-Funded Search Investors Terms: What are your thoughts on Put Rights?

investor profile

December 04, 2024

by an investor in Austin, TX, USA

I’d love to get the opinions of both investors and searchers regarding put rights in self-funded search deals.

To be clear, by a “put right,” I’m referring to investors having the right to sell their shares back to the company on a best-efforts basis at some point in the future – a way for minority investors to ensure an eventual exit from their investment.

In two recent deals we reviewed, Main Street Capital Network investors (we are a syndicate of 150+ SMB investors—individuals, family offices, and funds) discussed put rights extensively. Both deals had them, but there were some questions regarding mechanics and enforcement mechanisms, so it would be great to learn how others view this. Below are some initial thoughts, but I would very much appreciate feedback from other investors and searchers.

By the way, if you're an accredited investor interested in investing in search and independent sponsor deals with us, please reach out here.

Also, searchers/independent sponsors looking to raise equity can contact us here (our investment criteria).

Should investors have a put right?

They are becoming increasingly common. I’m assuming this is because more finite-life private equity funds are entering the space, and more deals are being made that include investors outside the searcher's immediate personal network.

As an investor, I believe there should be a mechanism to ensure I receive my investment returns at some point. Still, I have heard searchers argue that this effectively turns the investment into a debt-like instrument.

If investors have a put right, how should it be structured?

When does the exercise period start?

I most commonly see an exercise period that begins five years after the transaction closes, presumably because most models market an IRR based on a five-year exit. The next most common start I see is 10 years post-close, which allows the exercise period to begin after SBA debt is paid off.

I think five years is a little too soon, but there is no need to wait until the SBA debt is completely paid off.

How long is the put exercise period?

I think it’s critical for the exercise period to last at least several years after it starts. Suppose there is only a short window to exercise. In that case, investors have to hope that at the exact point the exercise period begins, the business isn’t at a low point in the cycle, the searcher isn’t frontloading expenses in anticipation of the put exercise period, credit markets aren’t tight, etc.

How is valuation handled?

This is the trickiest part. I’ve seen several methods used, but I think some version of the following makes sense:

1. Use the multiple the deal was consummated at as the default valuation, which will be applied to TTM EBITDA at the time the put is exercised

2. Either the company or the investor can challenge the valuation with an independent valuation expert, which the challenger must pay for (in cyclical or project-based businesses, TTM EBITDA may not be representative of the business's long-term earnings power, or if EBITDA has changed significantly, the old multiple may no longer be relevant)

Limits

It should be made clear that the company will repurchase the shares on a best-effort basis. Investors cannot exit the position if the business is facing financial distress or cannot borrow money to repurchase shares.

redacted

You can learn more about us on our website.

Searchers / Independent Sponsors

If you are raising equity for an acquisition or expect to do so in the future, don't hesitate to contact us here (see our investment criteria). We like to connect with searchers/sponsors at any stage (currently searching, preparing an LOI, or under LOI).

Investors

If you're an accredited investor interested in investing in search and independent sponsor deals with us, please complete this short investor form.

5
8
146
Replies
8
commentor profile
Reply by a professional
from Dartmouth College in Los Angeles, CA, USA
Agree that puts have become more common as more sophisticated PE and family office investors enter the space, but often it is tied to a specific event and not just a time horizon. For example, if the revenue of the company dips below a certain threshold or certain IRR targets aren't met. The idea is that the Put only makes sense if things have NOT gone well, if things are going well it makes no sense to allow the put since it could undercut a sales process and a minority sale would not command the same valuation. Also, valuation should not be tied to the original multiple but should be re-determined by advisors at the time of the put. Trying to peg a multiple 5 years in advance is a recipe for disaster. Again, this is likely a situation where the company is not doing well, so agreeing to the same multiple on a minority sale of a potentially distressed company would be a bad idea.
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
in Phoenix, AZ, USA
Puts are certainly becoming more common, particularly in self-funded search deals and because folks are raising closed-end funds to invest in search deals. The put solves the investor problem of misaligned duration, but it doesn't do much for the acquisition entrepreneur...

It feels to me that incentives aren't fully aligned with a 5yr put right and 10yr fully amortizing PG debt. The put almost definitionally forces a recap - depending on the size of the business this also may mean taking on additional PG debt and restarting the amortization clock, which is quite net negative for the searcher...

As Michael mentioned, I would also want the terms of the valuation to be articulated upfront (and imo should not grant hypothetical multiple expansion).
commentor profile
+6 more replies.
Join the discussion