Self funded vs. Funded Economic Returns / Models for Searchers

by a searcher from Columbia University - Columbia Business School

5 years ago

I've been considering whether to pursue a self funded search or a funded search (or search at all) and believe I largely understand the qualitative pros and cons. I'm trying to get a better sense of the economics for the searcher of the two models in a typical deal size for a funded vs. self funded search.  I understand the general structure of a funded model (i.e. 30% incentive units vesting in 3 stages) but was wondering if anyone had done any math or a very high level model comparing the two options and looked at both as a solo searcher vs. a partner search.
Thanks!

13 likes
746 views
12 comments

searcher from The University of Chicago - Booth School of Business

The biggest advantage to the self-funded searches is you'll have a much better chance of actually closing a deal. In other words, economics of closed/exited deals would have a survivorship bias in favor of traditional search (and even there I think the numbers aren't as good). The economics of the traditional search are such that only a large acquisition really makes sense for the searcher. There are a lot of smaller deals with great valuations that you can find if you're willing to bet on yourself.

1 year ago | like reply | 1 like

searcher from Harvard University - Harvard Business School

Have done some modelling, and there are infinite scenarios, but if you take the following:

Self-Funded: 1.1M EBITDA purchased for 5M, with 1.25 financed by investors. Assume carry is split 70/30 searcher/investor. Grow EBITDA 5% annually, sell after 6 years for same multiple, searcher gets $6.4M in cash flows from sale and cashflows from prior years (excluding salary), investor gets $4.3M.

Funded: $2.2M EBITDA purchased for $16M, with $9.3M financed by investors. Assume carry is split 20/80 searcher/investor. Grow EBITDA at same rate of 5% as in self-funded scenario, and also sell after 6 years for same multiple. Searcher's cash flows will be $4M (all from carry, no salary included), and investor's cash flows will be $26.3M.

Assumed 8% pref and 35% minimum distribution in both scenarios. So clearly with 5% growth, self-funded model is more financially attractive. Funded model requires more growth to unlock additional carry. If I adjust growth to 15% in both scenarios, and change carry in the Funded scenario from 20/80 to 30/70 searcher/investor (in this scenario, investor's IRR is 27%), then both payouts to the searcher are approximately even: 12.2M in self-funded, and 12.5M in funded. But the cash flows begin rolling in to the searcher faster in the self-funded scenario, whereas in the funded one all come in only at sale of the company.

1 year ago | like reply | 2 likes

More on Searchfunder

Just Closed on My First Deal! Reflections and Takeaways for other Searchers

45,152 transactions are available on Searchfunder (now searchable by keyword)

Now everyone has unlimited IBISWorld access

Family office looking for traditional searchers

2 Best Ways To Find Motivated Sellers, Off-Market Deals

Downsides of "buying a job" below 750k+ EBITDA?

Thought piece: Proprietary sourcing methods that delivered 2 acquisitions

6-7x for a Self-funded Search Deal?

Searchfunder is an online community and toolkit for searchfunds. Over 80% of those involved in searchfunds maintain a Searchfunder.com account to help them network, problem solve challenges, and keep up with the industry.

We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.