Hi there,
I'm at HoT stage with a seller.
They have now gotten their solicitor (non-M&A specialised) involved who is taking apart quite a lot of it.
I'm trying to remind everyone that this is just the HoT and most of it isn't legally binding, but am expecting that the solicitor will push back.
One major point is that he wants to remove the costs section, where we reciprocally agree to pay for the incurred DD costs if we retrieve from the deal during DD.
Any thoughts on this?
Have you involved a solicitor before being under exclusivity (ie to craft the HoTs)?
How have you dealt with the Cost reimbursement clause?
Thanks in advance.
F
Solicitors for HoTs and Reimbursement clause?
by a searcher from KEDGE Business School
More on Searchfunder
Searchfunder is an online community and toolkit for searchfunds. Over 80% of those involved in searchfunds maintain a Searchfunder.com account to help them network, problem solve challenges, and keep up with the industry.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
The reimbursement clause is relatively unusual. However, changing it now (after it was agreed) is reopening negotiations on this point. You might want to reassess how much renegotiating you have patience for. It depends on the commercial terms and how much you want to do the deal.