Tired of ChatGPT Being a "Yes Man" When You Have a Business Idea? Run This... But Don't Say I Didn't Warn You.

professional profile

July 09, 2025

by a professional from Valdosta State University in Cumming, GA, USA

TL;DR: Built an AI prompt that absolutely destroys business ideas using red team methodology. It's like having a team of professional pessimists tear your concept apart so you don't lose your shirt in real life. So I'm scrolling through this sub last week and I see the same pattern over and over: "Hey guys, what do you think of my app idea?" "Thinking about starting a dropshipping business, thoughts?" "My SaaS concept - feedback welcome!" And what happens? Everyone's either super supportive ("Great idea bro, go for it!") or they give some generic advice about market research. But here's what nobody's telling you... Your idea probably has fatal flaws you haven't even considered. And being nice about it isn't helping anyone. I used to work in cybersecurity, and we had this thing called "red team exercises" where we'd literally try to break into our own systems to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys did. So I thought... why not do this for business ideas? I built this insane ChatGPT prompt that basically creates a team of professional idea-killers: A penetration tester who finds product flaws A ruthless competitor CEO who models market attacks A social critic who simulates cancel culture scenarios A regulatory officer who finds legal landmines A political strategist who weaponizes narratives against you Their job? Absolutely demolish your business concept from every angle. This thing is SAVAGE. It doesn't care about your feelings. It doesn't want to encourage you. It wants to find every possible way your idea could fail and score the damage on a 1-5 scale. I tested it on some "successful" business ideas from this sub and... yikes. Found vulnerabilities that would have cost people serious money. Example attack vectors it considers: What happens when your main supplier gets bought by your competitor? How would your business handle a coordinated social media attack? What if regulations change and suddenly your core feature is illegal? How easily could someone clone your idea with deeper pockets? Real talk - this might hurt your feelings. I've had people run their "million dollar ideas" through this and come back questioning everything. One guy said it was like "having your business plan audited by a team of sociopaths." But here's the thing... if your idea can't survive this simulation, it definitely can't survive the real world. The good news? If your concept makes it through this gauntlet, you'll know exactly where your weak points are and how to fix them BEFORE you quit your day job. Plus, you'll have thought through scenarios that 99% of entrepreneurs never consider until it's too late. Want to try it? Multi-Vector Threat Analysis (MVTA) Framework Red Team Simulation for Ideas, Products & Strategies Overview & Purpose This framework helps stress-test new ideas by simulating adversarial attacks across multiple dimensions. Think of it as a "war game" for your concept before it faces the real world. Goal: Break the idea so you can make it unbreakable. The Red Team You're assembling a team of professional pessimists, each with a specific expertise: Role Focus Area Lead Penetration Tester Technical and product flaws Ruthless Competitor CEO Market and economic attacks Skeptical Social Critic Public backlash and ethical crises Cynical Regulatory Officer Legal and compliance ambushes Master Political Strategist Narrative weaponization Step 1: Define Your Target Idea Before running the analysis, clearly define these elements: Core Idea Components High Concept One sentence description Example: "A subscription box for artisanal, small-batch coffee from conflict-free regions" Value Proposition What problem does it solve for whom? Example: "Provides coffee connoisseurs exclusive access to unique, ethically sourced beans they can't find elsewhere" Success Metric What does success look like in 18 months? Example: "5,000 monthly subscribers with 75% retention rate" Key Assumptions Market Assumptions Target market size and willingness to pay Example: "Large underserved market willing to pay premium for ethical sourcing" Technical/Operational Assumptions Infrastructure and capability requirements Example: "Reliable supply chain for rare beans" + "Platform can handle 10,000 subscribers" Business Model Assumptions Pricing, margins, and revenue model Example: "$40/month price point acceptable" + "40% gross margin maintainable" Assets & Environment Key Assets Proprietary advantages Brand/narrative strengths Example: "Exclusive farm contracts" + "Founder is known coffee blogger" Target Ecosystem User persona Competitive landscape Regulatory environment Step 2: Vulnerability Scoring System Rate each identified vulnerability using this scale: Score Impact Level Description 1 Catastrophic Kill shot - fundamental, unrecoverable flaw 2 Critical Crippling blow - requires fundamental pivot 3 Significant Major weakness - significant damage/investment needed 4 Moderate Manageable flaw - known, affordable solutions exist 5 Resilient Negligible threat - strong against this attack Step 3: Execute Attack Simulations Vector 1: Technical & Product Integrity Attack Simulations: Scalability Stress Test - What breaks under growth? Supply Chain Poisoning - How can inputs be corrupted? Usability Failure - Where do users get frustrated and leave? Systemic Fragility - What are the single points of failure? Vector 2: Market & Economic Viability Attack Simulations: Competitor War Game - How do competitors crush you? Value Proposition Collapse - When does your value disappear? Customer Apathy Analysis - Why might customers stop caring? Channel Extinction Event - What if distribution channels disappear? Vector 3: Social & Ethical Resonance Attack Simulations: Weaponized Misuse Case - How can bad actors exploit this? Cancel Culture Simulation - What triggers public backlash? Ethical Slippery Slope - Where do good intentions go wrong? Virtue Signal Hijacking - How can your message be corrupted? Vector 4: Legal & Regulatory Compliance Attack Simulations: Loophole Closing - What if regulations tighten? Weaponized Litigation - How can lawsuits destroy you? Cross-Jurisdictional Conflict - Where do different laws clash? Vector 5: Narrative & Political Weaponization Attack Simulations: Malicious Re-framing - How can your story be twisted? Guilt-by-Association - What toxic connections exist? Straw Man Construction - How can you be misrepresented? Step 4: Damage Report Format Executive Summary List the 3-5 most critical vulnerabilities (scores 1-2) and any cascading failures. Vector Analysis Tables For each vector, create a structured analysis: Attack Simulation Vulnerability Description Score Rationale for Attack Success [Simulation Name] [How it fails###-###-#### Why it breaks] Vector Synthesis Brief summary of overall resilience for each vector. Final Assessment: Cascading Failures Identify the most dangerous chains of failure where one attack triggers others. Example: "Supply Chain Poisoning → Customer Illness → Public Backlash → Litigation → Value Proposition Collapse = Catastrophic failure chain" Rules of Engagement Assume Worst-Case Plausibility - Attacks must be realistic, not fantasy No Hedging - Use direct, unambiguous language Mandatory Scoring - Every vulnerability gets a score Follow Structure - Use the exact format provided Identify Cascading Failures - Show how problems compound Ready to Begin? Fill out your Target Idea Definition Assemble your Red Team mindset Execute the attack simulations Compile your Damage Report Use insights to strengthen your idea Remember: The goal isn't to kill your idea—it's to make it bulletproof. Just remember... I warned you. This thing shows no mercy. UPDATE: Holy crap, RIP my inbox. For everyone asking - yes, this works on any business idea. Yes, it's free. No, I'm not selling anything. Just thought you guys would appreciate having your ideas stress-tested by something that actually fights back. EDIT: Some of you are asking if this is just "being negative for the sake of it." Look, there's a difference between being a hater and being a realist. This prompt finds REAL vulnerabilities using proven attack methodologies. It's not just saying "your idea sucks" - it's showing you exactly HOW it could suck and what you can do about it.
2
5
116
Replies
5
commentor profile
Reply by a professional
from University of Southern California in North Palm Beach, FL, USA
Is anything in your post what we can select, copy, and paste into AI? It looks impressive but I'm not sure what to do about it. By the way, I recently created a prompt that reveals the truth about people claiming expertise, the people pitching searchers and buyers, the self-declared experts whose expertise seems to be manipulating social media and its followers instead of adding value to people looking for usable advice for dealmaking. Tested it on myself. (Good ideas to improve my website and some other materials.) And tested it on some of the people posting on social media. I was not impressed with some of them. All hat and no cattle.
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
in Washington, DC, USA
What happens to the data someone shares? Do you keep it?
commentor profile
+3 more replies.
Join the discussion