How would you structure this deal with demonstrated customer concentration risk?
Hey All,
Thank you all @redacted @redacted and others for your feedback on my previous post regarding personal guaranteed risk on an asset-light SBA deal (redacted and was hoping to get additional feedback. All of the feedback was greatly appreciated. Would love your thoughts on noted customer concentration risk and your thoughts on what determines your ceiling on a deal like this?
Deal snapshot, kept general:
12+ year old Wholesale/Import Business serving big box retail and distribution channels, roughly 50/50 split. Lean low staff, owner-operated business. Owner has been focused on operating with near-zero selling and now wants to retire.
TTM revenue ~$1.2M, gross margin ~70%+ (double-edged sword, pronounced upside and downside potential)
TTM SDE ~$530K
Offer lands at an SDE multiple in the mid-2x, DSCR still comfortably above 2.5x
I believe complexity could be the enemy of this deal, so I'm trying to construct the least complicated deal that protects on the known retail (and distribution) customer concentration risks. I've built an offer with Forgivable Seller's Note with a simple % revenue loss that protects against large single customer loss. and use it as a negotiating lever on terms or just be ready to grow and accept the risk? Since I arrived at SDE myself, would you state your SDE multiple in your LOI or too small of a deal to worry (again, added complexity). Or do the details qualify a walk away to you?
In response to some of your curiosity regarding revenue decline, the last 6 years showed a clear COVID bump in this wholesaler's industry, so normalization was expected. Recent years saw a continued decline and, from my analysis, has stabilized over the last 24 months to level, near pre-COVID levels. Some customer concentration did rear its head on this business in 2024, with a major retailer reducing SKU count (retail placement decision affecting many suppliers) while at the same time, recognizing this business's long-standing 100% fill rate relationship, this big retailer extended an offer of shelf space and a single private labeled SKU to this business. This is the primary cause of the 20% revenue decline from '24 to TTM. Concentration still a concern but mediated now with the decline and potentially in the forgivable seller note.
This deal has been a slow burn since the Seller has been insistent on waiting for the other party to put forward a serious, structured offer. I'm actually glad for the time. With no sell-side broker and the Seller only recently securing M&A professionals, I've been left to calculate Cash Flow Statements, SDE, and COGS from raw Quickbooks reports, a risk that is only truly dawning on me. Since this is a 20-year wholesale business and the Seller's been using cash-based accounting, true accrual COGS has been difficult to determine. I arrived at the 82% gross margin through multiple years of beginning and end of year inventory plus the mid-year purchases from the tax records. This turned out to be inaccurate.....
I was able to get my hands on a real Excel mess of TTM revenue by SKU # (sometimes over 10 SKUs related to the same item #) to do a bottom-up COGS calculation. ClaudeAI and I are best buddies by now and I was able to parse out by cross referencing against cost/item and freight that the true accrual COGS is higher than the tax documents revealed. The Seller's book values aren't lined up with the reality in the TTM. Gross margins are still strong at ~70+%, SDE ~530K, but I almost put in an LOI that was too high on this one. I don't believe this seller to be deceptive, they just knew their margins were great (between 70 and over 80 depending on item and channel) but never a major concern and operated on cash accounting to maximize tax reduction. For any buyer, true COGS is a critical piece of information and has brought my offer back to reality.
I learned a very valuable (and thankfully free) lesson here. When dealing with unsophisticated Sellers (and brokers for that matter), you really need to get into the weeds on proving out the numbers, so you don't find yourself deep in expensive due diligence and find issues like this. @redacted @redacted really appreciated your inputs here and, on SDE, it surely has declined with revenue. With my extensive analysis of the data and conversations with the Seller, I fully understand the decline and stabilization. Thanks @redacted @redacted I also understand all the growth levers that are currently not being pulled and have priced the offer to allow survivability room in up to a 20%+ decline. @redacted It seems my skillsets of sales, distributor sales channel building, major new account capture/account management, and logistics are a real fit for this one. Plus, I've always been drawn to the industry it operates in.
My adjusted offer lands at an SDE multiple in the mid-2x, DSCR still comfortably above 2.5x. Forgivable seller note component has two forgiveness tiers (but may simplify to one) with the first sized to recognize a single customer loss within the first 2 years. The structure allows for growth in one customer can offset any decline of another, a fair structure I feel. Thanks @redacted @redacted The consignment agreement will have to be buttoned up by my attorney for protection. In this particular case, the Seller has accumulated an overstock of inventory, almost 1/2 of which is slower moving or dormant (some currently being liquidated). A clear consignment agreement allowing for agreed upon liquidation of slow items and dollar-for-dollar extraction of value is in both of our interests. Speed and conviction to close on a bankable deal (with the Seller's bank) with well thought out plans for a proper handoff and the Seller's oversized inventory are my advantages here.
A competing buyer is still flailing a bit with offers that put way too much note risk on the Seller and a timeline that would likely lag beyond Seller's ideal transition. The DSCR on their offer must be barely above 1.25x, so I suspect they've certainly not done the deep analysis this deal requires. I'm not chasing their numbers. I may end up losing this one to a pie in the sky seller financed offer from a party who hasn't done the work, but we'll see.
I feel like the analysis on this deal has been an advanced education. I also see this as a "buy small and build" situation where me and a very small crew will be growing this business and adding headcount with revenue. If I can get this LOI signed, that is!